BLM Opens Comment Period on SE Oregon RMP Amendment
On May 31, 2019 the Federal Register published the “Notice of Availability of the Draft Southeastern Oregon Resource Management Plan Amendment and Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Malheur Field Office, Vale District, Oregon” and announced the opening of a 90 day public comment period.
The purpose of the draft amendment and environmental impact statement is to revise the 2002 Southeastern Oregon Resource Management Plan (RMP), as amended in 2015 and 2019 by the Oregon Greater Sage-grouse Approved RMP Record of Decision (ROD), in accordance with the terms of the 2010 settlement agreement between the BLM and the Oregon Natural Desert Association (ONDA). ONDA sued the BLM in District Court challenging the RMP, and though the RMP was upheld, ONDA prevailed on appeal. The BLM filed for a rehearing of the court’s remedy and the matter was stayed during settlement negotiations. In June 2010 a settlement was reached whereby the BLM agreed to update the planning area’s wilderness characteristics and to analyze management of wilderness characteristics, OHV use, and a pair of grazing issues. The result was this draft amendment, whose content can be accessed HERE.
The draft presents five alternatives on which the public has been invited to submit comment. (See below.) Following the closing of the public comment period (August 28, 2019), the BLM will develop a Proposed Southeastern Oregon RMP Amendment and Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) with changes and adjustments based on public comments. The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires, in addition to a range of alternatives, a No Action Alternative, i.e. no change to the existing plan. The alternative selected for the proposed SEORMP/ROD could include parts from more than one of the alternatives as well as from the public comments.
The following descriptions of the alternatives is taken verbatim from the Federal Register announcement:
■ The No Action Alternative represents the continuation of existing management under the 2002 Southeastern Oregon RMP and Record of Decision (ROD) (as amended by the 2015 Oregon Greater Sage-Grouse RMP Amendment) with the inclusion of interim management stipulations outlined in the 2010 settlement agreement. These stipulations require the protection of wilderness characteristics in 76 public land units where the BLM's updated inventory found wilderness characteristics to exist.
■ Alternative A is the BLM's preferred alternative and reflects the continuation of existing management under the 2002 Southeastern Oregon RMP and ROD (as amended by the 2015 Oregon Greater Sage-Grouse RMP Amendment) without the restrictions of the 2010 settlement agreement. The 2002 Southeastern Oregon RMP and ROD did not provide specific management for, or protection of, lands with wilderness characteristics. If this alternative were selected, the 2002 Southeastern Oregon RMP and ROD would not prioritize protection of lands with wilderness characteristics outside of existing wilderness study areas. Processing voluntary grazing permit relinquishment and implementation of measures to address standards and guidelines for rangeland health would continue as under current management and policy. Management of all other resources would continue under the 2002 Southeastern Oregon RMP, as amended. Existing allocations at the land use planning level (such as visual resource management classes, OHV categories, and rights-of-way authorizations) across the planning area would not change. Under Alternative A, the BLM would continue to provide for a sustainable yield of forage for livestock grazing while maintaining resource values for long-term multiple use, consistent with management objectives, and would be unchanged from current practices.
Alternatives B, C, and D would establish new management protections for units of public land (outside of existing wilderness study areas) that have been identified as having wilderness characteristics. The specific units identified for protection varies by alternative.
■ Alternative B reflects the highest level of protection required by the 2010 settlement agreement. Alternative B prioritizes protection of wilderness characteristics in all 76 units determined to possess wilderness characteristics. The 76 wilderness characteristics units and all wilderness study areas would be managed as closed to OHV use, and existing primitive routes would be closed to motorized travel. In addition, in all other units where off-road vehicle use is currently allowed (referred to as “open”), OHV use would be limited to existing roads and primitive routes. To address the 2010 settlement agreement in this alternative, where existing livestock grazing practices are found to be significant causal factors for non-attainment of standards and guidelines for rangeland health, the BLM would suspend grazing permits, either at the allotment- or pasture-scale, for the duration of the RMP in units identified in the 2010 settlement agreement. Should the BLM receive a voluntary permit relinquishment in a wilderness study area, designated national wild and scenic river corridor, designated national historic trail, area of critical environmental concern, research natural area, a unit found to possess wilderness characteristics, or designated critical habitat, the BLM would designate the units as unavailable to grazing (or reduced grazing use where common use by multiple permittees occurs) for the life of the Draft Southeastern Oregon RMP Amendment and Draft EIS.
■ Alternative C prioritizes protection of 27 of the 76 units found to have wilderness characteristics. Use of OHVs in these 27 units would be limited to existing roads and primitive routes, unless currently designated as limited to designated routes or closed to OHV use. This alternative would continue existing OHV open management in eight specific units located in the north half of the planning area. For all other units currently managed as open to OHV use, Alternative C would change management to limited to existing roads and primitive routes for motorized vehicle use. The BLM would continue to follow existing policy when livestock grazing practices are found to be significant causal factors for non-attainment of standards and guidelines for rangeland health. The BLM would also continue to follow existing policy when a voluntary grazing permit relinquishment is received.
■ Alternative D reflects an alternative method for addressing lands with wilderness characteristic units, OHV use, and livestock grazing that is required by the 2010 settlement agreement. This alternative is less protective than Alternative B. Alternative D prioritizes the protection of 33 of the 76 units found to have wilderness characteristics. As required by the 2010 settlement agreement, all 76 units with wilderness characteristics would be managed as OHV limited, unless currently allocated as limited to designated routes or closed to OHV use. Wilderness study areas would continue to be managed under the 2002 Southeastern Oregon RMP, as amended, as limited to designated routes under this alternative. To address the 2010 settlement agreement in Alternative D, where existing livestock grazing practices are found to be a significant causal factor for non-attainment of standards and guidelines for rangeland health, the BLM would suspend term grazing permits, either at the allotment- or pasture-scale, for the duration of the term permit (generally up to 10 years) or until monitoring indicates that significant progress is made toward meeting standards and guidelines in units identified in the 2010 settlement agreement. Should the BLM receive a permit relinquishment in a wilderness study area, designated national wild and scenic river corridor, or designated national historic trail, the BLM would designate the unit as unavailable to grazing (or reduced grazing use where common use by multiple permittees occurs) for the life of the document.
The BLM Vale District Office will be holding three public meetings at which you may submit comments:
Ontario, OR – June 24, 2019, 5-8:00 pm (Four Rivers Cultural Center)
McDermitt, NV – June 25, 2019, 5-8:00 pm (McDermitt Community Center)
Jordan Valley, OR – June 26, 2019, 5-8:00 pm (Jordan Valley Lions Hall)
Comments can also be submitted on line HERE. The instructions for submitting comments stress that they be “substantive” and “reasonable” and not just expressions of opinion.
Early reactions to the draft that might be of interest include those by ONDA (HERE) and Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership (HERE). The Owyhee Basin Stewardship Coalition has not yet responded, but members reportedly will be attending the public meetings. For developments be sure to consult also the Friends of the Owyhee Facebook page.
Let us hope this will be the beginning of a civil discussion to the benefit of the Owyhee Canyonlands and all those who treasure them, whether they live there or just visit. It could be a badly needed example to the rest of the country.